This is meant to be used as a test of the blog engine.
Please note that if you specify your email address you will likely receive emails when other people perform tests.
[code=csharp]
public delegate MyDelegate(object o, EventArgs e);
[/code]
[code=xml]<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<office:document-content
xmlns:office="urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:office:1.0"
xmlns:text="urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:text:1.0"
xmlns:table="urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:table:1.0"
office:version="1.1">
<office:body>
<office:spreadsheet>
<table:table table:name="Sheet1" table:protected="true" table:protection-key="GP/dLT3aX7DfrbOCH/PuEuj01Kw=" >
<table:table-row >
<table:table-cell office:value-type="float" office:value="10">
<text:p>10</text:p>
</table:table-cell>
</table:table-row>
<table:table-row>
<table:table-cell office:value-type="string">
<text:p>Dear Rob Weir. Please prove by this example that ODF is an "interoperable"
document format and tell me how a consuming application should determine if the
user should be allowed to modify the document. I do not think that it is.
In fact I think that your statements that ODF is a document format that
provides interoperability are brash, irresponsible and indefensible
pieces of bombast that you should retract.</text:p>
</table:table-cell>
</table:table-row>
</table:table>
</office:spreadsheet>
</office:body>
</office:document-content>[/code]
d4d3729f-f732-4adc-920c-31ed5e92e153|0|.0|96d5b379-7e1d-4dac-a6ba-1e50db561b04